River: Filming (indoor interview)

This was an easier scene to film, as it was shorter and we weren't effected by weather conditions. It is a short, 20 second scene about the ferry man's interview. It was the perfect room to film in, as it was cramped, claustrophobic and silent, which was perfect as we were trying to capture the nervousness in the room. My role as the writer left me in showing the contrast in the interviewer and Ron in the lines. I did this by giving the interviewer's lines conviction and power, while making Ron's the opposite of this: Nervous and anxious.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Life of Death: Analysis

Image
The life of death is an interesting spin on the idea of the grim reaper, as it begins with him dying, then shows flashbacks of his life. I thought this was a good film to analyse, as it is similar to ours in that it takes the idea of death and the afterlife and distorts it to create their own idea for a film. The movie begins by showing several tranquil long shots of inner city New York, setting up the theme and location of the film. The first establishing shot is shown which starts in parallel to the non-diegetic soundtrack, which is both happy yet tranquil.This opening scene is filmed in the morning time, which could be the director trying to convey hope or new life. This is heavily ironic as it is juxtaposed to the theme of death that the audience assumes through the title. Living beings, humans and dogs alike, are shown in his opening scene, which further conveys the theme of life which juxtaposes the character of death.    As the scene progresses, we see death, ...
Read more

The Heist: Analysis

Image
Narrative is created to appeal and entice an audience and to maintain their interest. From the start of The Heist, the audience is already enticed by the short due to several narrative techniques and codes. At the start of the short when the 2 guys are pitching their idea, the film seems to be of a normal structure and chronological code, as they are stating what they want to do where they want to do it. It is when they begin telling the man how they want to do it when the film switches to an anachronic structure, as the viewer sees the different back-stories of every character, each weirder and more detailed than the last. Since the genre of this short is comedy, it is significant that it doesn’t strictly follow Todorov’s narrative theory, as this be seen as comedic. There is an equilibrium, yet it is becomes more disrupted as the film progresses. At the end of the film, the equilibrium is at it’s most disrupted, due to the paradoxical image presented. The equilibrium is not rein...
Read more